Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Directional Exit Signs


The Joint Commission Statement of Conditions™ requires exit signs to be readily visible from any direction of access and it refers the user to NFPA 101®, Life Safety Code® section 7.10.1.2.

Exits, other than the main exterior exit doors that obviously and clearly are identifiable as readily visible from any direction of exit access.

An exit sign with directional indicator should be installed to indicate the direction of travel to the exit. While there are many situations where the actual need for exit signs is debatable, it is desirable to be on the safe side by providing signs, because it is known that panic seldom develops, even in the presence of danger, as long as occupants of buildings are moving toward exits where signs are visible within a reasonable distance in the path of travel.

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Damaged Sprinklers


NFPA 101®, Life Safety Code®, 2000 edition mandates in Section 9.7.5 that “All automatic sprinkler and standpipe systems required by this Code shall be inspected, tested and maintained  in accordance with NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems” [1998 edition]. Section 2-2.1.1 of NFPA 25 states, “Sprinklers shall be inspected from the floor level annually. Sprinklers shall be free of corrosion, foreign materials, paint, and physical damage and shall be installed in the proper orientation, e.g., upright, pendant, or sidewall. Any sprinkler shall be replaced that is painted, corroded, damaged, loaded, or in the improper orientation.” A damaged sprinkler (pictured) can have a detrimental effect on the performance of sprinklers by affecting water distribution pattern, or rendering the sprinkler ineffectual. In its new Life Safety Chapter (which will take effect January 1, 2009), The Joint Commission has a relative requirement in standard LS.02.01.35, Element of Performance No. 5, which states, “Sprinkler heads are not damaged and are free of corrosion, foreign materials and paint.”

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Monday, December 12, 2011

Backup Fuel to Hospital Boilers


Does The Joint Commission have a requirement for providing backup fuel to hospital boilers?  (e.g. Natural gas boiler with fuel oil backup.)

USP-NF Chapter 797


We have a Pharmacy area that is not compliant with the Chapter 797 ruling in the mixing room that will be renovated in the next year but not before our survey, is this something that would fall under the EOC Guidelines?  

Monday, December 5, 2011

Post-op Infection Control


Are there any Joint Commission requirements or standards that restrict a surgical scrub technician or circulating nurse from helping with the turnover and cleaning of a surgical room between cases?

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Generator testing - dynamic vs. static loads

TJC Standard EC.02.05.07, EP5 requires annual load testing under certain conditions.  Specifically the EP states "The emergency generator [20 to 40 day] tests are conducted with a dynamic load that is at least 30% of the nameplate rating of the generator or meets the manufacturer’s recommended prime movers’ exhaust gas temperature.  If the hospital does not meet either the 30% of nameplate rating or the recommended exhaust gas temperature during any test in EC.02.05.07 EP 4 then they must test each emergency generator once every 12 months using supplemental (dynamic or static) loads of: 25% of nameplate rating for 30 minutes, followed by 50% of nameplate rating for 30 minutes, followed by 75% of nameplate rating for 60 minutes, for a total of 2 continuous hours."

Hospitals often want to know what the difference is between dynamic loads and static loads.  Simply put, dynamic loads are the hospital emergency power loads that are connected to the transfer devices - motors, lights, receptacle loads, and the like.  Static loads, on the other hand, are load banks.

NFPA 110 does not use this terminology.  The related paragraph from NFPA 110 only refers to "supplemental loads."

Readers may also want to refer to my separate blog entry discussing the "not less than" terminology found in the latest version of NFPA 110.

NFPA Disclaimer: Although the author is Chair of the NFPA Technical Committee on Emergency Power Supplies, which is responsible for NFPA 110 and 111, the views and opinions expressed in this message are purely those of the author and shall not be considered the official position of NFPA or any of its Technical Committees and shall not be considered to be, nor be relied upon as, a Formal Interpretation. Readers are encouraged to refer to the entire text of all referenced documents.  NFPA members can obtain NFPA staff interpretations at http://www.nfpa.org/.